setstats The Herald of India
Home | About us | Contact us | Educational | Counseling | Letters | Archive | In memoriam | Obituary | Jobs & Careers | Classified
  Greetings to all our readers and patrons
         
Stewardship and Trusteesh
  By A.J. Philip  
  I ACCOMPANIED Prime Minister Manmohan Singh on his visit to South Africa on the occasi  
  Read more ...  
  DEVOTIONAL  
 
   
Letter to Metropolitan
  By Rev A.P. Jacob and five other priests  
  Most Rev. Dr. Joseph Mar Thoma Metropolitan Most Rev. Dr. Philipose Mar Chrysostom Mar  
  Read more ...  
 
  COUNSELING
 
Back to infancy -- they n
 
  By Shaheen Chander  
  ENJOYING a relaxed weekend, I was checking updates on the Facebook page. I came across a b  
     
  Read more ...  
  LETTERS  
     
  ???????  
  By  balvinder Posted at 28/10/2010  04:02:18  
  chandigarh    
  Though India is considered as one of the most corrupt countries, no one has ever tried to pinpoint the corrupt people and areas, leave aside any attempt to cleanse this stigma.
If the above stated generalised view is accepted there is no reason to disbelieve that our judiciary is also not above board. This perception gets vindicated by the fact that of late cases involving judicial persons in corruption have come to light.
In such circumstances at least one thing can be said with surety that our judicial system, if not fully corrupt, at least is not as independent as it is supposed to be and remains firmly caught in the clutches of the powers that be.
Thus it was more than obvious that the government of the day, led by the Congress, would have allowed the pronouncement of any judgement on Ayodhya that would have allowed the BJP to get any political mileage. More so, with CWGâs sword hanging precariously on its head with the whole world having an eye on India, the Congress could never perceive of any riotous situation that would have gone out of its control.
While every part of the seemingly Congress-favouring judgement on this apparently volatile issue is being discussed, threadbare, by the media, no one has raised one pertinent question.
Suppose the BJP had not demolished the Babri Masjid structure. Could then, in the presence of the structure, the court pronounce this very judgment that would have allowed its legal demolition, as the place has sought to be a temple?
 
  By  Balvinder Singh Posted at 01/10/2010  01:37:58  
  Chandigarh    
 
 
     
Your Name *
 
     
Your E-mail *
 
     
Place
 
     

Your Comment *
Your remaing character is

Comments are moderated and generally posted if they are topical and not abusive..

     
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Terms & Conditions | Disclaimer | Advertise With Us |   Copyrights: The Herald of India, 2009. All rights reserved.